Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Hyundai Ioniq 9 Impresses As The Best Affordable & Roomy 3-Row Electric SUV In The US

    Why Kiehl’s sells its best-selling face cream in refills

    SMA America to Launch Domestic Integration for MVPS Solutions

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Eco Planet PowerEco Planet Power
    • Alternative Energy
    • Energy Hub
    • Environment Issues
    • GreenBiz
    • Renewable News
    • Wind Energy
    Eco Planet PowerEco Planet Power
    You are at:Home»Uncategorized»DraftKings gets slapped with fine for online slots that paid zilch
    Uncategorized

    DraftKings gets slapped with fine for online slots that paid zilch

    adminBy adminSeptember 3, 2024011 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    DraftKings and White Hat Gaming were fined a total of $22,500 by the state of Connecticut after their online slot machine failed to pay out winnings for a week, as reported by NBC News. The Department of Consumer Protection discovered the non-paying slot machine and imposed fines on DraftKings for $19,000 and White Hat Gaming for $3,500. Despite promising players that their slot machine would pay out 95 cents for every dollar wagered, the machine did not issue any winnings from August 15-21 of the previous year, with over 20,000 spins and $24,000 spent by 522 players during that time. A glitch caused by an improperly loaded file was identified as the reason for the malfunction, which was fixed and the game relaunched on August 22, 2023. DraftKings and White Hat Gaming did not disclose the issue to state officials until prompted by the Consumer Protections department, and some players reported never receiving any winnings despite multiple spins. The machine continued to malfunction until White Hat Gaming resolved the issue a second time, providing refunds to all affected customers without informing DraftKings. While White Hat Gaming responded promptly to inquiries, DraftKings’ response was deemed unsatisfactory, resulting in a higher fine.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleElon Musk’s Starlink will comply with the Brazil X ban after all
    Next Article Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold review: A grown-up, glowed-up foldable
    admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Apple wins $250 in Masimo smartwatch patent case

    October 26, 2024

    Lyft will have to tell drivers how much they can truly earn, with evidence

    October 26, 2024

    Waymo raises $5.6 billion to fund Austin and Atlanta expansion

    October 26, 2024
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Renewable Energy Market and Growth Update 2023

    September 15, 202311 Views

    what’s next for DOE’s hydrogen and direct air capture hubs, and how to engage in the process

    April 26, 202310 Views

    Meta will pay $1.4 billion to Texas, settling biometric data collection suit

    July 30, 20244 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Comparison: The Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of COVID-19

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021

    Florida Surgeon General’s Covid Vaccine Claims Harm Public

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021

    Signs of Endometriosis: What are Common and Surprising Symptoms?

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021
    Most Popular

    Renewable Energy Market and Growth Update 2023

    September 15, 202311 Views

    what’s next for DOE’s hydrogen and direct air capture hubs, and how to engage in the process

    April 26, 202310 Views
    Categories
    • Alternative Energy
    • Energy Hub
    • Environment Issues
    • GreenBiz
    • Renewable News
    • Uncategorized
    • Wind Energy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.