Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Hyundai Ioniq 9 Impresses As The Best Affordable & Roomy 3-Row Electric SUV In The US

    Why Kiehl’s sells its best-selling face cream in refills

    SMA America to Launch Domestic Integration for MVPS Solutions

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Eco Planet PowerEco Planet Power
    • Alternative Energy
    • Energy Hub
    • Environment Issues
    • GreenBiz
    • Renewable News
    • Wind Energy
    Eco Planet PowerEco Planet Power
    You are at:Home»Uncategorized»In its first Threads case, Meta’s Oversight Board asked for clarity on death threats
    Uncategorized

    In its first Threads case, Meta’s Oversight Board asked for clarity on death threats

    adminBy adminSeptember 10, 2024001 Min Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Meta’s Oversight Board has weighed in on its first Threads case, reversing the company’s initial decision and first appeal regarding a post criticizing outgoing Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida. The phrase “死ね,” translated to “drop dead / die,” was considered figurative and not a literal threat. The case originated from a Threads post accusing Kishida of tax evasion, leading to the use of the controversial phrase. Despite being reported under Meta’s rules, the post went unnoticed until flagged under different guidelines. Two human reviewers deemed the post in violation, leading to an appeal that ultimately reached the Oversight Board, which overturned the removal decision. The Board’s explanation highlighted the non-literal nature of the criticism and the importance of considering context in evaluating such posts. Recommendations were made to clarify internal guidelines and empower reviewers to better assess cases involving language nuances and cultural contexts. The Board also called for clearer distinctions between threatening language directed at public figures versus high-risk persons and emphasized the need to protect rhetorical political speech. This decision adds to the Oversight Board’s activities in September, following previous rulings on controversial phrases and threats in other cases.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe key updates that make AirPods 4 block sound better — and just sound better
    Next Article Amazon’s Fire HD 8 tablet is more than half off and close to its Prime Day price
    admin
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Apple wins $250 in Masimo smartwatch patent case

    October 26, 2024

    Lyft will have to tell drivers how much they can truly earn, with evidence

    October 26, 2024

    Waymo raises $5.6 billion to fund Austin and Atlanta expansion

    October 26, 2024
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Renewable Energy Market and Growth Update 2023

    September 15, 202311 Views

    what’s next for DOE’s hydrogen and direct air capture hubs, and how to engage in the process

    April 26, 202310 Views

    Meta will pay $1.4 billion to Texas, settling biometric data collection suit

    July 30, 20244 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Comparison: The Maternal and Fetal Outcomes of COVID-19

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021

    Florida Surgeon General’s Covid Vaccine Claims Harm Public

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021

    Signs of Endometriosis: What are Common and Surprising Symptoms?

    By adminJanuary 15, 2021
    Most Popular

    Renewable Energy Market and Growth Update 2023

    September 15, 202311 Views

    what’s next for DOE’s hydrogen and direct air capture hubs, and how to engage in the process

    April 26, 202310 Views
    Categories
    • Alternative Energy
    • Energy Hub
    • Environment Issues
    • GreenBiz
    • Renewable News
    • Uncategorized
    • Wind Energy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.